PvP Class Discussion

So, we all know the easiest class to use in PvP is the knight. But in the hands of a skilled player which class do you think would be the most deadly? I personally believe knights are NOT the best, just the easiest to be good with leading to the misconception that they are the best. Anyways, lets have some PvP discussion!

The only one I've played with is wizard. The problem with them being that all the attacks are multi hit meaning unless you get a goood hit, it's fairly weak. Also, range classes can easily stay away and hit, and warrior and knight could easily stand infront of of you and take you down with a few attacks without much concern for themselves. I feel that this could be balanced a little by simply making star shot the mages attack allowing for the use of three skills.

I say ninja, if only for the sake of its' range. I never played one but it can set mines on the floor, if you were skilled enough to time it right, I'd say it'd be golden. Ninjas should be accustomed to attacking from far away like other ranged classes and so they have alot of practice to avoid being hit. It's merely speculation because I haven't played any of the ranged classes.

I know Japanese WK and our WK is different, but I have to say... they are really fast based on the videos I saw.

true, mages seem a little underpowered in PvP so far.

well imagine if you had to use one of your hotkeys for basic attack...

yeah, i can imagine how horrible that would be:P
then you only get 2 skill slots for combos

I think an archer has the potential to be the most deadly.
With their plethora of stunning combos, they can make short work of most.
I've never played one, so I have no idea how hard it is to land a stun.

I think many of us can appreciate, though, the importance of stunning in a pvp match.

though stunning just makes them unable to move.
they can still use skills, and attack so stunning isn't too important.
though it does give you an advantage.

Oh?
I hadn't known that. Figured if you get hit on the head with a hammer and couldn't move, you wouldn't be able to cast magic spells either.

in cbt I you could also still dash to move too.

Realistically, that makes sense. Perhaps the magicians chant spells instead of actually moving. However, stunning a person in real life takes away the inability to think I believe.

Hmm...

the most annoying class to pvp against would be priest....they keep runing and healing them selves....

On the one hand, if the player is really skilled, I guess some sort of melee class would own.
They would just evade the projectiles since they take some time until they hit the target.

On the other hand, if the player is really skilled, he/she will be able to predict movements of his/her enemies and shoot at the right time to hit them.

Conclusion: Really skilled players own everyone and get owned by other really skilled players.

Really.

In other words: the one who knows how to counter other classes the right way, will win.

yeah, thats what I say.
but, if all players are at equal levels of skill.
which would you believe to be the deadliest when used right?
thats the question im really asking:P

Well this way... I think the player with faster reflexes wins

I can't really make a class decision here.
I didn't play so many classes in CBT I.

If I just HAVE to make a decision, I would probably go for priest - at least if he doesn't get killed in one blow. ^^

Im thinking knights would be better.
They have OMGWTF amount of hp, and a priest can't really kill anyone. (spiritual reasons. you know.)

I think pvp gets more in-depth later with more skills to play around with.
Anyone can have an ace-in-the-hole you need to watch out for.

I still don't believe knights would win.
there skills are easy to dodge, knights are the best with a low level of skill.
knights seem to more, like they're really easy to use in pvp, not really any deadlier with a little bit of skill.

Well.
Every class has it's pros and cons.
'Cept for warrior. Their skills are easy to dodge, and their hp is crap, and they need to melee.

Now I feel sad. Oh well I stick by my choice nonetheless.

I really wouldn't think it would be archer, but its just an opinion. I think it would be like... knights with they're good def. Even though they have more of a short range attacks, still think it would be best.

Though archers are actually great at pvp.
there leaf shield and there pollen burst(which does a % of there max hp as damage, aka knight killer) and cyclone arrow are amazing pvp skills.